By now, two weeks into the new year, some of you may already have made and broken at least one New Year’s resolution. Don’t despair. If your resolution involved forming a new habit, like going to the gym at least twice a week, it may take just a little longer than two weeks to become fully formed. Neuroplasticity research indicates that new habits can rake three to four weeks to become part of your daily life. I have written about the dark side of neuroplasticity in previous posts but the lessons are these for breaking old habits and forming new ones:
1. You can do it but it will take time and effort and, most importantly, planning
2. You will have to go about it very deliberately
3. You will have to persist–three or four weeks or longer
4. If you revert to an old habit, just try again…persist
For myself, I am renewing a resolution I and a friend made last year. We had done our grading for first degree black belts in karate two years previously, and were going to go for our second degree. We didn’t make it. His health had worked against him and as for me…well the teachers who were guiding us didn’t think I was ready. So this New Year’s resolution is the same. Just last week I ran into another black belt that went for the grading as my friend and I and he told me he did the second degree grading last June. I was dismayed and amongst the many thoughts that ran through my head was one about dropping out of karate altogether. That one saddens me since I took up the martial art in the first place to improve my cognitive functioning. I didn’t entertain that thought for long and have now recommitted.
More on this at a subsequent date…
The controversy over the Arrowsmith Program in the Toronto Catholic District School Board is pretty well over. Richard Allway, the newly appointed supervisor of the board is overturning the decision to cut the Arrowsmith program from schools ending a lawsuit brought by parents against the board and Ontario’s Education Minister.
In a letter to parents Mr.Allway stated that after careful review and in consultation with the board’s director of education, the program would be continued for students already enrolled until 2012. He also stated that he was sure that the rationale to cut it in the first place was at the time in keeping with the best of human and fiscal resources.
Arrowsmith was one of the first programs designed to improve performance in children with learning disorders that exploited the concept of neuroplasticity. The program arose from techniques developed by Barbara Arrowsmith Young to address her own learning problems. Her aim was not to compensate for her weaknesses but to strengthen the cognitive capacities underlying them.
The Toronto Sun reported today that the Scarborough-North York trustee for the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB), John Del Grande, has called for an emergecy meeting to reopen the TCDSB’s decision to drop the Arrowsmith Program, for reasons of cost, just two days before the school year end last June. This latest move happened just hours after some parents of chidren who had been in the program filed a lawsuit naming the Minister of Education, Kathleen Wynne and the province’s supervision team as well as the TCDSB. The notice of application for judicial review asks for the immediate reinstatement of the Arrowsmith program and that the court review the decision to cancel it. Lawyers acting for the parents claim the supervision team headed by Norbert Hartman was acting outside of its jurisdiction when they cancelled the special education program. John Del Grande said that the move goes against the decision of the Board’s special education advisory committee which had recommended keeping the program until at least 2011. One of the parents involved in the suit said, “All we want is a fair shake for the kids.”
A month or so back I wrote that one of the first neuroplasticity programs, Arrowsmith, was about to be dropped by the Toronto Catholic District School Board fo reasons of cost. It’s a little more complicated than that. The Board had asked Arrowsmith to waive their fees over the next two years while the Board conducted a study to see specifically if the program made a difference to subjects in the classroom. There is a similar program using Cogmed Working Memory Training currently running at Sick Children’s’ Hospital in Toronto under the auspices of Rosemary Tannock. Arrowsmith refused and the Board dropped it. Well now it seems that the parents of the children who were enrolled in the program, there are about 70 of them, are taking the Board to court to get them to reverse the decision saying, according to an article in the Toronto Sun, that “the children enrolled in the program will be irreparably harmed.” Named in the suit are: Education Minister’s provincial supervisor Norbert Hartmann, associate supervisor Norm Forma and the Toronto Catholic District School Board. Michael Watson, a partner at Gowling, Lafleur, Henderson LLP, speaking on behalf of the parents said, the case, which has yet to be proven in court, isn’t about money, it’s about helping those children. ” Parents can disagree with decisions of the board … what’s really different about this case is we say this decision was made completely unlawfully and contrary to various provisions of the regulations under the Education Act and beyond the jurisdiction of the supervision team,” Mr Watson says that this team has interfered with and meddled in a very important special education program of the board under the guise of a budget matter. He went on to say that the parents fundamentally believe in the Arrowsmith Program and that it has achieved results.
A new study, that will be published in the August edition of Applied Cognitive Psychology, conducted at the University of York in the U.K. shows that stimulant medication significantly increases visuo-spatial working memory but that Cogmed Working Memory Training leads to significant improvements in all four critical measures of working memory: verbal and visuo-spatial short-term and visuo-spatial working memory. In addition the training effects were still in place when the subjects were retested six months later.
The subjects were 25 children with ADHD. The study is the latest from the team of Joni Holmes Ph.D and Susan Gathercole Ph.D who have been performing independent research examining the impact of Cogmed training on subjects with ADHD and working memory problems.